Tampilkan postingan dengan label Los Angeles. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Los Angeles. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 24 September 2015

PrEP Study NOW Recruiting in LA, Long Beach


Research Study Information (in Spanish below)

Are you a man interested in taking medication that could reduce your risk of getting HIV (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, otherwise known as PrEP)?

Are you HIV-negative or know of someone who is HIV-negative?

Are you sexually active with men?

Are you at ongoing risk for acquiring HIV?

If so, you may qualify for a PrEP study at LABioMed at Harbor-UCLA and the Long Beach Health Department that is looking to see if text messaging reminders can improve taking the study medication according to schedule.

If you are interested in participating in this study, contact Angela at (310) 222-3848

-------------
Estudio de Investigación

Es usted un Hombre interesado en tomar medicina que le reduzca el riesgo de adquirir VIH (Profilaxis para evitar infección de VIH, también llamado PrEP)?

Es usted VIH-negativo o conoce a alguien que es VIH-negativo?

Es usted sexualmente activo con hombres?

Esta usted en constante riesgo de adquirir VIH?

En este caso, usted podría calificar para un estudio de PrEP que se lleva a cabo en LABioMed/Harbor-UCLA y el Departamento de Salud de Long Beach. El estudio esta evaluando si los mensajes de texto ayudan a mejorar la constancia a tomar medicinas durante el estudio.

Si esta interesado en participar, favor de llamar a Ángela al
(310) 222-3848

 

Rabu, 12 Agustus 2015

VIDEO:4 Months on PrEP - BareBack Sex, Less Stress, Moving Forward

Day 121: My PrEP Journey

The incredible, passionate, smart and oh so charming prevention advocate Ken Almanza from LA (who we featured on the blog in April ) is back with a new video update talking about his life, sex, relationships, and  being on PrEP.

Four minutes or so - and well worth your time.


Rabu, 20 Mei 2015

That's What He Said Part 2 - Jody's Persistence (and Community Support) Pays Off

“Come in and see me. Tell me more and let’s get this fixed,” he said....


...While my experience with Doctor Nameless wasn’t ideal, it was eye-opening. If it had to happen to someone, I’m glad that was someone who had the tools, resources, and voice to find a better solution and seek a change.


by Jody Wheeler*

When I say “bitch” I didn’t mean randomly. Facebook is mostly just cat pictures, traffic complaints and filtered selfies, after all. Noise not signal.

Yet there are some great groups on Facebook, pages on a wide variety of issues, run by people who interested in sharing information, providing support, and making things better. PrEP Facts: Rethinking HIV Prevention and Sex, is one of those Facebook groups.

PrEP Facts was started by Damon Jacobs, a therapist and PrEP activist from New York City. I’d found his group it while researching PrEP and Truvada. While often raucous and combative, that energy comes from its passionate membership — doctors, educators, epidemiologists, regular folk — deeply committed to getting the word out about PrEP. Information, resources, and support are all to be found there. I knew I needed to post there.

On-line, I recounted a (far briefer) version of my visit with Doctor Nameless. At the end of my tale, Iasked the group for both help in finding a better doctor and more information on bone-density loss, the one aspect of my recent craziness I wasn’t up on. I didn’t give Doctor Nameless’ real name out in the public forum. His medical group — UCLA Health — that I eventually stated.

In spite of my experience, I wasn’t looking to start an internet pogrom of torches and angry villagers against the man. It was important to get the facts out, to find out if what I went through was a common experience, but not to lambast someone by name, just as an example. I did decide that, on a case by case basis, if appropriate, I would disclose his name.

The response from the PrEP facts group was overwhelmingly affirmative. Not just posts that commiserated with me, but actual, hands down great advice and recommendations. The names of good doctors from across the city poured in. Some people even recommended I fly to their city to see their doctor or go to the clinic they worked at. It wasn’t lost on me that was something I might be able to swing, but what about all those other folks that couldn’t?

The thing that most surprised me were the numbers of folks who told me that Doctor Nameless’ response was unethical, bordering on malpractice.

I hadn’t thought about it in those terms. Annoying? Sure. Maddening, no doubt. Bang-off-the-walls-and-jump-in-a-lake-of-ice-cubes? It felt that way. But the ethical or malpractice suggestion gave me pause.

The American Medical Association says that, as patients, we have the:

“…. right to receive information from physicians and to discuss the benefits, risks, and costs of appropriate treatment alternatives. Patients should receive guidance from their physicians as to the optimal course of action…The patient has the right to courtesy, respect, dignity, responsiveness, and timely attention to his or her needs.”

which translated as requiring patients to receive correct information, to treat our concerns as real, and not to have a physician substitute their values for our own. For mine.

Another group member compared what happened to what some women have experienced from certain doctors and pharmacists when they ask to go on the Pill. While I’m still not convinced Doctor Nameless engaged in malpractice, in light of that comparison and the AMA’s standards, I don’t think what happened was all that ethical.

The most surprising thing that happened as a result of my post was that another physician from UCLA Health reached out and got in contact with me, Dr. Raphael Landovitz. Landovitz is a researcher and practitioner, the co-director also Co-Director of the UCLA CARE clinic, which is specifically devoted to the care and prevention of HIV. He’s also been at the forefront of implementing PrEP across Los Angeles.




On my call with Dr. Landovitz, he was incredibly apologetic, mortified even, by my experience. It wasn’t what was supposed to happen anywhere within UCLA Health. He was surprised when I told him the real name of Doctor Nameless, and quite frustrated to find that Doctor Nameless’ attitude was more wide spread than he knew.

“Come in and see me. Tell me more and let’s get this fixed,” he said.


So I did.

It’s pretty wild when the head of a busy medical practice bends-over backwards to accommodate your schedule. (Surprising limber, that Dr. L.) Right of the bat that a huge upgrade from my earlier encounter.

When we did meet a few days later, it was crazy how impressive Dr. Landovitz was. He knew his shit. Better than I could ever hope to. I had had questions. He had answers. The right answers. Detailed. He citied studies. He explained what those studies meant in non-scientific human speak. (I can speak some Scientific Speak, but just not that fluent.)

He floored me when he pulled out a spreadsheet with various measures of my body functioning. He showed how we’d track all those measures, making sure there were no side effects from Truvada. While unlikely, he pointed out what could happen — and how to fix it.

I’m a nerd. I love data. Just between us? I had a nerd-gasm.

As we wrapped up this initial visit, he explained to me the prescription for Truvada, how to take it, what to take it with, and about the follow-up visits, near-term and long. I felt so much better about my decision to go on PrEP. That cinched it as the right choice for me.

When AIDS hit the public in 1982, I was 13. I was just putting my sexuality together, the whole “realizing I’m different” thing that young gaylings invariably have to do. As I grew, so grew the epidemic. People died.

My first job out of college was as an HIV/AIDS educator with the Whitman-Walker Clinics, trying to stop some of that death from happening. My second, after I got my Masters in Counseling Psychology, was as a therapist for people either dying of AIDS or dealing with HIV. I was 24.

Whether I wanted it to or not, “Gay” and “AIDS” had become linked. Joined. Inseparable. And that lasted…until now.

With the advent of PrEP, there’s now have second, potent weapon to stop HIV infection. While it doesn’t block all STIs, taken correctly, it does HIV. Hell, taken incorrectly, it still works pretty damn well. It’s a remarkable advance. I’m glad I’m here and healthy to see it.

While my experience with Doctor Nameless wasn’t ideal, it was eye-opening. If it had to happen to someone, I’m glad that was someone who had the tools, resources, and voice to find a better solution and seek a change.

I got to meet Dr. Landovitz, who I can’t speak of highly enough. In addition to continuing to see me for PrEP, he’s working along with his boss, Dr. Judith Carrier, to make sure what happened to me doesn’t happen to anyone else in the UCLA Health system. He told me to refer anyone, Los Angeles or not, to his clinic.

They’d do what they can to find them the best referrals possible. The UCLA CARE clinic’s number is (310) 557-2273.

For the Doctor Nameless, who I think meant well, but fell far short of optimal patient care, I’m hoping the accumulated data from the new CDC guidelines, as well as information from other co-workers, turns around his point of view. If he remains resistant to prescribing Truvada for PrEP, he should make referrals on to other clinicians better able to help patients decide if PrEP is right for them.

For me, my PrEP experience is only starting. Not just on a preventative medicinal level, but on an activist one.

It’s now important for me to get the message out about this treatment, share information, and work to bring down the barriers that prevent anyone, at any societal level, from accessing this treatment. I was here to see the birth of this pandemic of HIV.

I’m now hoping that My PrEP Experience will include seeing the end of HIV once and for all.


*A former therapist and social worker, Jody Wheeler, M.Ed., M.F.A., is a writer and director in Los Angeles California.

Selasa, 19 Mei 2015

That's What He Said - Part 1

What had begun as a promising visit to the doctor to begin PrEP, the most revolutionary advance in HIV prevention in decades, had instead become a misadventure into ignorance, idiocy, and irritation.


by Jody Wheeler*
Los Angeles, CA

As the elevator dinged downward, my headache ripped free the sides of my skull, pounded the torn pieces into a fine mist, and set to work violently assaulting the naked nerves.

Things hadn’t gone well.

Not at all.

What had begun as a promising visit to the doctor to begin PrEP, the most revolutionary advance in HIV prevention in decades, had instead become a misadventure into ignorance, idiocy, and irritation. The first two of those belonged to my doctor. The last, as my pounding head attested, me.

Picture for a moment a 40-something white guy, a poster-child for education, a beneficiary of cultural privilege, a fortunate freelancer taking advantage of newly affordable health care (Thanks, Obama!), visiting a doctor for, among other things, PrEP. Picture me. Picture me dashing. I like dashing. Dashing is a good, charismatic word. Picture me stunning if you like. That works to. No complaints.

Anyway. I sat in a brightly lit medical exam room, paper-wrapped table in front of me, ample selection of children’s toys near me (the office had a thriving pediatrics practice) an uncomfortable wire backed chair under me, and a friendly-faced doctor beside me. “Doctor Nameless,” as I shall refer to him, as “Anger Inducing Ignoramus” is too long to repeatedly write of this essay. He’d been typing notes of my visit into his handy medical records terminal.

“Anything else for this visit?” he asked with a smile.

“I’d like to go on PrEP,” I said.

His friendly countenance faded, as dark clouds of concern descended across his brow. “What do you know about PrEP?” he said, the storm building with each word.

I rattled off six months of constant reading: PrEP stood for “Pre Exposure Prophylaxis”, where the drug Truvada is taken daily as a preventative against HIV infection; multiple studies have shown consistent and correct use provides a level of protection against HIV equal to or better than condoms; the side effects of Truvada were generally mild to non-existent in healthy individuals, but still needed to be monitored for safety; that most major insurance carriers now covered the drug; and best of all, from an epidemiological standpoint, Truvada protects against HIV even when people miss a dose.

Hoping for a cookie, Doctor Nameless instead gave me an unexpected response: he said neither he nor any other doctor in his practice would prescribe Truvada for PrEP. He stated Truvada’s protection is uncertain and unproven, it destroys the body, and leads to long term and dangerous health consequences.

“In those studies, scientists don’t even know if it was the Truvada or the condoms that provided the protection people keep quoting,” he said with utter seriousness.

Dafuk? went the 12-year old smart-ass who lives in the back of my head. Did you check to see if he’s actually a doctor and didn’t just borrow a coat from someone golfing —

Yes. Shut up and let me talk, I told that 12-year old smart-ass who lives in the back of my head.

“That’s not what the research shows,” I began. I tried not to sound like a know-it-all. I failed. I always fail in these moment. I do try. Researchers had correlated blood serum levels of Truvada with the preventative effect achieved. It was all about the pills, not the condoms. While I wasn’t an expert on biology, the methodology provided in the journals was powerful stuff. “The research is quite robust,” I finished.

My pushback surprised him. I guess patients usually don’t respond with sentences containing “journal articles”, “blood serum levels”, and “methodology.”

He pivoted the conversation and said Truvada would destroy my kidneys. His words echoed as my mouth had fallen open from utter incredulity, thus providing the perfect acoustic shape between my tounge, throat and teeth for his silliness to bounce and fade, bounce and fade.

Get out. Get out now! Run, dude! Runaway! Again, the 12-year old smart ass who lives in the back of my head.

Know-it-all me engaged Doctor Nameless again. I told him there was little evidence of that in HIV negative people. Some research subjects did have their kidneys work harder, but for most of them, that passed. Very few people in the study had to stop treatment because of a risk of damage. In any event, medical guidelines still mandated monitoring for just that possibility.

Again, not what he was expecting, as our conversation veered into a new, oncoming traffic lane of screeching, beeping, destruction: Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). “Truvada doesn’t protect against STIs, so it isn’t safer sex,” he said rather definitively.

The headache I mentioned at the top of this essay? This is the exact moment when it started. I remember distinctly. It walked in, said Hey, I’m here. I’ll be your headache for the next few hours. I’m going to start banging around, driving you nuts. I brought friends. I think we’re ordering pizza, too, and got to work causing my head to hurt.



“The perfect can’t be the enemy of the good,” I said to Doctor Nameless, now visibly peeved.

“Condoms don’t protect against all STIs either. And who said anything about using Truvada to protect against other STI? This is about HIV.”

(On the ride home, I realized I should have added that a condom on your cock won’t protect you from an STI in your mouth. Vivid image, right? I blame the headache.)

You might think it ended there, with me peeved, him realizing I’d read some stuff, and the chorus of fictional characters from my over-active imagination having a pizza party while a head-ache throbbed away. Nope. I continued to spar with Doctor Nameless.

“The lab work is expensive!” (My insurance will cover it.)

“What we really need is a vaccine!” (Call me when we have one.)

“Truvada is only right for sex workers!” (I almost said that having sex with my last boyfriend was nothing but work, but I again managed to silence the 12-year old wise ass in me before he took the floor.)

I’d about reached my peak. But I was still hoping, still willing to play another few rounds of That-ain’t-true-about-Truvada ping-pong, in the hopes that maybe I could change his mind, correct his mistakes, or just get to a happy medium.

He served again:

“Truvada will destroy the bone-density of your hips over the next 20 years,” he said. Ping.

“Doc, in 20 years I’ll be 65. Lots of other things could destroy my hips by then.” Pong.

“You could have to get your hip replaced!” Ping.

“I don’t think there’s anything in the research that says that’s likely.” Pong. (I didn’t know a great deal about this one area. Later I’d come to find, surprise, he was wrong on this, too.)

“But you know people who break their hips go into the hospital …and then die!” And he spikes the ball!

I know. I shifted from ping-pong to volley-ball. It seemed apt. Besides, with that comment, he’d done it. He'd reached The Ridiculous Zone and I wasn't interested in boldly going onward, seeking out and exploring new worlds of stupidity, ignorance, and despair. I pulled back. I got quiet. I went to my happy place. Or tried to. The headache was in the way.

"I see I've offended you,” he all but deadpanned.

Ya' think? (That wasn’t the 12-year old wise ass. That was me.)

As if he was dealing with a petulant 12-year old, he shook his head and said that if, after everything he’d mentioned, I still wanted to go on Truvada, he'd run a full battery of tests and require quarterly visits in order to keep the prescription current — the standard treatment that every doctor who prescribes Truvada is supposed to do.

If he’d stopped there, I might have left with some semblance of respect for him. His on-line reviews said he was a good physician, his work history was impressive, and his schedule was always booked with patients. I could have gone off thinking he meant well but just wasn’t right for me.

Alas, he blew it by adding, “And as you destroy your health, I’ll be there for you. We’ll go through it together.”

We’ll be there too, said the throbbing headache (and his friends.)

You know I’m always here, added the wise-ass 12-year old from the back of my mind. He snacked on a slice of the headache’s pizza.

Wanting to salvage something from the visit, and worried that my insurance would force me to see this guy again — that doesn’t happen, but in the moment, that was a concern — I told Doctor Nameless to go ahead and run the tests. I’d deal with everything else later. So he cultured the back of my throat, passed me off to an incredibly nice nurse / vampire who pulled several vials of blood from me for testing. Then I pissed in a cup, stuck a swab up my ass, jammed it in a specimen tube, and left.

Oh, and his office didn’t validate.

In the car, on the way home, I was pissed and angry. That shouldn’t have happened at a top-tier medical group in a big city like Los Angeles. His ignorance and value judgement were being imposed over my own. It struck me also that if I was having these problems, what about people without my same advantages? How are they dealing with such impediments to prevention? I’d heard stories. Now they were real in a far different way.

There was only one thing to do next, one way to achieve clarity, find guidance, and strategize ways to turn this around in order to make things better.

I’d bitch about it on Facebook.

*A former therapist and social worker, Jody Wheeler, M.Ed., M.F.A., is a writer and director in Los Angeles California